NFTs

Subscribe to NFTs via RSS

This year, the SEC has ramped up its enforcement efforts against digital asset marketplaces for selling non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) (and other digital assets) the agency alleges are securities. In response, some potential targets for SEC enforcement have proactively sued the SEC, challenging its jurisdiction to regulate digital assets and/or seeking a declaration that the digital assets are not securities. Escalating tensions further, several private plaintiffs have also filed civil lawsuits against NFT issuers and/or marketplaces. The SEC continues to decline to issue regulatory guidance or engage in rulemaking on whether NFTs qualify as securities, instead focusing on selective enforcement actions against specific NFT projects and marketplaces. These developments underscore the regulation-by-enforcement approach that has characterized the SEC’s treatment of the crypto industry under the Biden administration. However, as we discuss below, 2025 may mark a turning point in the NFT regulatory landscape.Continue Reading NFT Legal Issues

Until fall 2023, there were few SEC enforcements or litigations involving securities issues with non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”). This has changed dramatically. In rapid succession last fall, the SEC undertook two enforcements against NFT projects for alleged securities law violations. Yet, the SEC has declined to provide regulatory guidance or rules regarding the treatment of NFTs as securities. Instead, the agency has chosen to engage in selective enforcement against NFT projects. This year, the SEC has ramped up its enforcement efforts against digital asset marketplaces for selling NFTs (and other digital assets) the agency alleges are securities. In each of these actions, the SEC has cited the use of smart contracts to trigger resale royalty payments to the NFT issuer upon the resale of an NFT as evidence supporting the classification of the NFT as a security.Continue Reading NFTs and Securities Law Issues Are on the Rise – SEC Analysis Relies on Resale Royalties

Introduced in response to certain digital media sellers (e.g., game publishers) revoking consumer access to purchases with little to no recourse, AB 2426 forces sellers of “digital goods,” such as movies, apps, games, books and music to clarify what a consumer is actually receiving in connection with their “purchase.” Often companies refer to the “purchase” or “sale” of digital goods, yet the associated terms of service make clear that the buyer only receives a revocable license to such goods. In some cases, if a buyer violates the terms of service, the license is revoked, and the user is denied further access to the digital goods. In other cases, a buyer may be denied access to digital goods it has “purchased” if the digital media platform shuts down.Continue Reading New California Law Targets Sellers of Digital Goods – Applicability to NFTs is Uncertain

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-Fungible Tokens and Intellectual Property on March 12, 2024 (“Report”). While the Report is comprehensive, it does not recommend any new action to address IP issues with NFTs.Continue Reading The USPTO and USCO Delivered a Report to Congress on IP Issues with NFTs – Maintains Existing IP Regime

The SEC has, in rapid fire, announced enforcements against two NFT projects for allegedly violating securities laws. The first action announced August 28, 2023 was against Impact Theory and the second action announced September 13, 2023 was against Stoner Cats. In both cases, two SEC Commissioners dissented. The SEC has taken these actions despite not first offering specific guidance on the applicability of securities law to NFTs. While these actions have come as a surprise to many in the NFT industry, we have been cautioning NFT projects about these issues for some time. And in our NFT Regulatory Issues – a 2022 Review and 2023 Preview, we commented:Continue Reading SEC Enforcements Against NFTs – Are You Next?

On August 28, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) instituted cease-and-desist proceedings under Section 8A of the Securities Act against Impact Theory, a Los Angeles media and entertainment company, alleging that the company’s sale of non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) violated the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”). Continue Reading The SEC’s Sudden Impact on NFTs!

We previously blogged about the NFT insider trading case against Nathaniel Chastain. He was charged with wire fraud and money laundering in connection with a scheme to commit “insider trading” in Non-Fungible Tokens (“NFTs”) by using confidential information about what NFTs were going to be featured on a marketplace homepage for his personal financial gain. Despite referring to this case as insider trading, there was no allegation that the NFTs at issue were securities. This caused many in the NFT community to question whether this activity could be illegal if the NFTs were not securities. In fact, there was a fair amount of misinformation circulated about this issue. To clarify the legal issues, we explained in a second blog about this case that there is Supreme Court precedent (Carpenter v. US) that found that mail and wire fraud charges need not be predicated on the underlying subject matter constituting a security. Nevertheless, Chastain moved to dismiss the indictment based on this and two other arguments. The Court refused to dismiss the indictment. The Court found that the Carpenter case “actually dooms Chastain’s argument.”
Continue Reading NFT Insider Trading Charge Doesn’t Require the NFT To Be a Security

We have previously addressed the recent indictment against Nathaniel Chastain, a former executive of a major NFT marketplace, for insider trading involving NFTs. The indictment charges Chastain with one count of wire fraud and one count of money laundering. It does not allege that the NFT is a security. It does not allege violation of the insider trading laws under securities law. Since then, as we have reported, that SEC has been investigating lack of insider trading policies for NFT/crypto exchanges.

Continue Reading NFT Insider Trading – Can There Be A Crime If It’s Not A Security?

It is well known that insider trading—the practice of buying and selling stocks, bonds, or other securities based on material, non-public information—is unlawful. For that reason, many companies have compliance programs and policies that restrict trading by officers, directors, employees or other “insiders” with access to such information. 

Continue Reading NFT Insider Trading Compliance Policies – What They Cover and Why You Need One